I have written many times about how deceiving Zakir Naik is. He has limited knowledge of the vedic texts and also of the "Hindu" dharma. With whatever he has memorized, he successfully distorts the meaning. In this conversation, a "Hindu" asks why would a "Hindu" be put into hell for believing in what he believes. Zakir Naik starts by talking about the "Shruthi" and "Smriti". He defines "Shruthi" as that which has come from "bhagawan", and "smriti" as that which humans have written. This is a popular understanding and partially correct. Shruthi is "apaurusheya", that which has not created by humans, or that which is beyond a human intellect so it is inspired by a higher source. The "Rishis" of sanAtana dharma contemplated through "tapo shakti" (many years of meditative penance) and realized some "truths" from within. These truths are eternal truth, that which will n
Through this forum I will attempt to share as much authentic information as possible about "Hinduism", "Vedic Traditions" and "Sanatana Dharma"'; in quotes as they lack a specific name. I will present translations of scriptures, sooktAs, and stotras; bring debates and discussions from other forums; shed some light on some of the misconceptions of Hindu thought; and expose miscreants who hope to malign the glorious dharma. Your comments and feedback are welcome.